Seymour perspective from Oakland

昐teve Corkran writes on the accord in the Oakland Tribune, with Raiders drillmaster Tom Cable adage a aggregation couldn't pay too abundant for Seymour, "The affair is, you wish to accomplish your aggregation bigger for appropriate now. Appropriate now is all that matters. We'll abode that if the time comes, but I don't see that as a negative, I absolutely don't. Not at this time."

昈akland Tribune columnist Cam Inman brand the move for the Raiders. "Al Davis bare to do something, and leave it to him to amaze the NFL apple already afresh with Sunday's trade," he writes. "Seymour isn't just a bolt of the day. He is able of authoritative an appulse for the next 120 days."

昈akland Tribune columnist Monte Poole addendum that Seymour faces continued allowance of afterwards with the Raiders. "Even admitting Seymour's prime absolutely is abaft him, there is acumen to accept he still can arouse addition year or three of superior football," Poole writes. "But not as a Raider."

旸avid White of the San Francisco Chronicle writes on why the Raiders targeted Seymour. "Their preseason run aegis was 32nd in the NFL, and has stunk back 2006. The division opener adjoin the Chargers is eight canicule away. This is the a lot of burning fix they could find."

昗hite aswell break down the accord in his "Silver & Black" blog.